世界速讀:歐盟評(píng)估蒔蘿酊劑作為所有動(dòng)物飼料添加劑的安全性和有效性
【資料圖】
2023年1月12日,據(jù)歐盟食品安全局(EFSA)消息,應(yīng)歐盟委員會(huì)要求,歐盟動(dòng)物飼料添加劑和產(chǎn)品(FEEDAP)研究小組就蒔蘿酊劑(a tincture derived from the fruit of Anethum graveolens L.)作為所有動(dòng)物飼料添加劑的安全性和有效性發(fā)表科學(xué)意見。經(jīng)過評(píng)估,專家小組認(rèn)為在建議的使用條件下該添加劑對(duì)目標(biāo)物種、消費(fèi)者和環(huán)境是安全的。由于其在飼料中的功能與在食品中的功能基本相同,因此認(rèn)為沒有必要進(jìn)一步證明其功效。部分原文報(bào)道如下:
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a tincture from the fruit of Anethum graveolens L. (dill tincture) when used as a sensory additive in feed and water for drinking for all animal species. The product is a ■■■■■ solution, with a dry matter content of approximately 0.9%. The product contained 0.0247% polyphenols (of which 0.0137% were flavonoids) and 0.003% carvone. Estragole was present at concentrations between the limit of detection and the limit of quantification in the five batches examined. The Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) concluded that the dill tincture is safe at the maximum proposed use levels of 200 mg/kg complete feed for horses and 50 mg/kg complete feed for all other animal species. The FEEDAP Panel considered that the use in water for drinking is safe provided that the total daily intake of the additive does not exceed the daily amount which is considered safe when consumed via feed. No safety concern would arise for the consumer from the use of dill tincture up to the maximum proposed use levels in feed. Dill tincture should be considered as irritant to skin and eyes, and as a dermal and respiratory sensitiser. When handling the additive, exposure of unprotected users to estragole cannot be excluded. Therefore, to reduce the risk, the exposure of the users should be minimised. The use of dill tincture as a flavour in animal feed was not expected to pose a risk for the environment. Since the fruit of A. graveolens and its preparations were recognised to flavour food and their function in feed would be essentially the same as that in food, no further demonstration of efficacy was considered necessary.
編輯:qysb005